If you are on Facebook, surely, you have seen rants about the way that math is currently taught. I want to defend one aspect of this "new math" for a moment.

Take this example:

I get it, believe me, I do! The way that student 'B' above solved the problem seems quite laborious and there is a lot of room for error when you need to break apart one addend, and then follow with two addition problems in order to solve the one original problem.

*The issue here is that there has been a miscommunication about what is being taught: procedure or concept.***The activity above, believe it or not, is**

*not*designed to teach a math procedure as far as the addition of 19+6 is concerned. The purpose of the activity is to use the operation of addition to teach place value, number sense and properties of operation.

Rest assured, the

*procedure*will be taught. Here is the standard at grade 4:

**Fluently add and subtract multi-digit whole numbers using the standard algorithm.**

However, prior to grade 4, let's use the operation of addition to teach and learn as much about place value as we can!

In grade 2, students are expected to:

So what does a "strategy based on place value" look like and how will this benefit our children and students?

In grade 2, students are expected to:

**Fluently add and subtract within 100 using strategies based on place value, properties of operations, and/or the relationship between addition and subtraction.**So what does a "strategy based on place value" look like and how will this benefit our children and students?

Take an expression like 27 + 32 above. In the standard algorithm you would stack the numbers, add the 7 and 2 and then add the 2 and 3. You would get a result of 59 and you would be absolutely right. Is there anything wrong with this algorithm? No!

... Unless that is you were hoping to teach place value concepts. I am going to walk you through a MUCH LONGER method. The purpose of this method is NOT to teach an addition procedure that a student would be expected to use for the rest of their life. It is to take advantage of addition to teach the concept of place value in a meaningful way.

First, a student would decompose 27 into 20 and 7 and 32 into 30 and 2. If you were to do 27 plus 32 in your head, it is likely that this is the first step that you might take. As adults, we flexibly break numbers apart so that we are able to do mental math. A child often thinks the number 27 just simply means "two seven".

Next, a student would be asked to put the tens together. As adults, we know that 27 + 32 is the same as 20 + 30 + 7 + 2 but a student learning the traditional algorithm learns nothing about the flexibility of numbers!

The step of putting 20 and 30 together in and of itself is a powerful step in learning about place value. Students can see that adding 20 + 30 is really as simple as adding 2 + 3. If 20 means two tens and 30 means three tens, 20 + 30 is really just putting 2 tens and 3 tens together. 5 tens = 50.

I'll remind you that I completely understand that the parent in the Facebook post above would right now be beside themselves with the above paragraph. Yes. This is A LOT more steps. Yes. There is significantly more opportunity for error in these steps. Yes. Yes. Yes. But I'm not teaching the procedure of addition. I am teaching place value concepts by USING addition.

As a side note, I work with students who are struggling with the math in their classrooms. A group of 2nd grade students who had been having a lot of difficulty with place value concepts went through this activity with me. Just working up to this point (in combination with a lesson about bundling groups of tens to create new units) and my

*struggling*students were able to calculate that 60 + 40 = 100 in their heads because 6 tens plus 4 tens = 10 tens and when you have 10 tens together you can call it 100!
After adding the tens together, students combine the ones together.

Lastly, students combine their group of tens and their group of ones to find their total.

How many times have you seen a student add numbers vertically and fail to line the digits up correctly? This type of work lays the foundation for why it is so important to line these numbers up correctly. A student who understands place value would not make a "lining up" mistake because they would know that 5 tens plus 9 ones could never equal 140. It just wouldn't make sense!

There is so much power in teaching place value through the use of operations. In the above problem you will notice that I did not deal with any regrouping. Working through a similar problem that does involve making a new ten has an additional layer of power in terms of teaching place value concepts.

I hope this post has been helpful in understanding the "other side" of what we are being asked to teach and why the standards are requiring that we hold off on the standard algorithm!

**I would love if you would follow me on Facebook for additional tips, tricks, lesson ideas, flash freebies, and sales. Click HERE to find The Math Spot on Facebook. To continue the place value blog hop, click below on the icon for "Lessons with Coffee".**